• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
SUSPENSION OF THE RIVERS STATE GOVERNOR BY THE PRESIDENT: CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS

SUSPENSION OF THE RIVERS STATE GOVERNOR BY THE PRESIDENT: CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS

‘We have recovered reasonable amount’ – EFCC gives update on N1.3trn CBEX crypto fraud

‘We have recovered reasonable amount’ – EFCC gives update on N1.3trn CBEX crypto fraud

Daura v U.B.N PLC: Landmark Supreme Court Decision on ‘Estate and Debt’ Responsibilities after Death

Daura v U.B.N PLC: Landmark Supreme Court Decision on ‘Estate and Debt’ Responsibilities after Death

PROHIBITION OF RIBĀ (INTEREST-BASED TRANSACTIONS) IN ISLAMIC FINANCE: CONCEPT AND SIGNIFICANCE

PROHIBITION OF RIBĀ (INTEREST-BASED TRANSACTIONS) IN ISLAMIC FINANCE: CONCEPT AND SIGNIFICANCE

Hajj 2025: Saudi Arabia deports Sheikh Gumi back to Nigeria

Hajj 2025: Saudi Arabia deports Sheikh Gumi back to Nigeria

JUST IN: Wike seals PDP National Secretariat in Abuja

JUST IN: Wike seals PDP National Secretariat in Abuja

JAMB Announces Date to release UTME Result for resit Candidates

99% Scores Below 200 in Resit UTME – JAMB

2023: Yoruba Elders Decide On Tinubu’s Presidency Ambition

Breaking: APC Governors endorse Tinubu as 2027 Sole Presidential Candidate

Peter Obi attends Pope’s inauguration in Rome to beg Tinubu over Fidelity Bank’s N225bn Debt Crisis – Report

Peter Obi debunk meeting Tinubu in Rome over alleged N225bn Fidelity Bank debt

FULL LIST: Dangote Refinery slashes Petrol Prices across Nigeria

FULL LIST: Dangote Refinery slashes Petrol Prices across Nigeria

Court stops Senate disciplinary action against Natasha Akpoti

Akpabio, Yahaya Bello to testify as Nigerian Govt files Criminal Charges Against Natasha

Canada, France, UK Impose Sanctions on Israel over Gaza war

Canada, France, UK Impose Sanctions on Israel over Gaza war

Peter Obi attends Pope’s inauguration in Rome to beg Tinubu over Fidelity Bank’s N225bn Debt Crisis – Report

Peter Obi attends Pope’s inauguration in Rome to beg Tinubu over Fidelity Bank’s N225bn Debt Crisis – Report

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy
Thursday, May 29, 2025
  • Login
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Commentary
  • Editorial
  • Campus
Home Commentary

SUSPENSION OF THE RIVERS STATE GOVERNOR BY THE PRESIDENT: CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS

by iDeemlawful
March 24, 2025
A A
SUSPENSION OF THE RIVERS STATE GOVERNOR BY THE PRESIDENT: CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS
FacebookTwitterWhatsapp

By Aisha Mohammed Agashi

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, in his address to the nation on March 18, 2025, declared a state of emergency in Rivers State. According to him, this decision was taken in line with the provisions of Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), which governs the procedure for the proclamation of a state of emergency.

In addition to the declaration of the state of emergency, the President also suspended the Governor of Rivers State, the Deputy Governor, and the members of the Rivers State House of Assembly for six months and appointed Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas (rtd) as the new Administrator of Rivers State.

RelatedPosts

Daura v U.B.N PLC: Landmark Supreme Court Decision on ‘Estate and Debt’ Responsibilities after Death

PROHIBITION OF RIBĀ (INTEREST-BASED TRANSACTIONS) IN ISLAMIC FINANCE: CONCEPT AND SIGNIFICANCE

Implications of Signing Court Processes with Name of Law Firm in Lieu of Lawyer’s Name in Nigeria

THE DOCTRINE OF NO CASE SUBMISSION: A LEGAL ANALYSIS

Section 305 of the Constitution vests the President with the power to declare a state of emergency, either at the request of the Governor or suo motu. However, the section stipulates strict conditions and procedural safeguards that must be followed to ensure that such extraordinary measures do not infringe on democratic governance and fundamental human rights.

The effect of a declaration of a state of emergency is that it empowers the President to adopt extraordinary measures to restore law and order when such is broken down or threatened. This aligns with Section 45(3) of the 1999 Constitution, which defines a state of emergency as a period during which the President is empowered to adopt extraordinary measures as conferred upon him under Section 305. However, neither Section 305 nor any other provision of the Constitution empowers the President to suspend an elected Governor.

The Supreme Court, in the case of Governor of Ekiti State & Ors v. Prince Sanmi Olubunmo & Ors (2017), unanimously held that a Governor lacks the power to dissolve democratically elected Local Government Councils. This decision resonant with the fact that the President of the country cannot suspend or remove an elected Governor or the State Legislature.

For the avoidance of doubt, Section 11(4) of the Constitution explicitly states that even when the National Assembly takes over the legislative functions of a State due to the inability of the State House of Assembly to perform its functions, such a takeover shall be without removing the Governor and Deputy Governor from office.

By virtue of Section 305(4), a state of emergency can be declared upon the request of the Governor. When granted, either by this request or by the President acting suo motu, the Governor has the constitutional role of working with the Federal Government to maintain law and order, among other duties. This provision makes it clear that even when a state of emergency is declared in a State, the Governor remains a party to its administration. Hence, the suspension of a Governor by the President is unconstitutional and ultra vires.

Section 188 of the Constitution sets out the conditions under which a Governor’s office can be declared vacant, whether temporarily or permanently. These include circumstances such as incapacity and other grounds stipulated under the section. It cannot, however, be argued that the phrase “extraordinary measures” mentioned in Section 305(3)(c & d) gives the President the power to suspend an elected Governor. This is because the Constitution clearly provides in Section 188 the specific conditions under which a Governor’s office may be declared vacant.

It is a well-established principle in law that “the express mention of one thing is the exclusion of another” (expressio unius est exclusio alterius). By explicitly stating the conditions for the removal of a Governor under Section 188, the Constitution excludes any other method of suspension.

Regardless of the political tensions in Rivers State, the suspension of the Governor, the Deputy Governor, and the State House of Assembly is unconstitutional, as the 1999 Constitution neither provides for nor suggests the suspension of an elected Governor. Furthermore, there is no provision in the Constitution that allows the President to remove an elected official, including a sitting Governor.

While the situation in Rivers State may be politically volatile, it fails to meet the constitutional threshold for the removal of an elected official, including the Governor, Deputy Governor, and the State Assembly. The President’s action amounts to a clear abuse of power, as he lacks the constitutional authority to remove an elected Governor under a state of emergency. Any such action constitutes an unconstitutional encroachment on democratic governance and the autonomy of State Governments.

Conclusion

It is incorrect to suggest that Section 305 empowers the President to remove an elected Governor, as the section only provides the President with the power to declare a state of emergency and take extraordinary measures to restore law and order in a State or the entire Federation.

To argue that Section 305 allows the President to suspend an elected Governor would be to suggest that if a state of emergency were declared in the entire Federation, the President would also be removed/suspend from office; clearly an absurd and unconstitutional interpretation. Thus, the suspension of the Governor, Deputy Governor, and Members of the Rivers State House of Assembly for six months is unconstitutional.

REFERENCES:

  • The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).
  • Governor of Ekiti State & Ors v. Prince Sanmi Olubunmo & Ors (2017) LPELR-42163(SC).
  • Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN: President, Nigerian Bar Association – “State of Emergency in Rivers: ‘Suspension’ or Otherwise Summary Removal of a Democratically Elected Governor and Other Elected Officials is Unconstitutional” (Available on businessday.ng. Accessed on March 20, 2025).
  • Daily Trust – “Tinubu’s Suspension of Fubara Can Be Overturned – Yadudu” (Available on dailytrust.com. Accessed on March 20, 2025).

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Aisha Mohammed Agashi is a recent law graduate of Bayaro University, Kano m, with interest in writing, legal research, politics among others. She has been actively involved in various academic and leadership roles, contributing to discussions on governance, law, and policy. Aisha is particularly interested in constitutional law, human rights, and the intersection of law and public affairs. She enjoys exploring legal issues through writing and research, aiming to contribute to informed discourse on contemporary legal and political matters.

To reach her, Email: aishaibnmohammed@gmail.com or visit her LinkedIn profile at: http://linkedin.com/in/aisha-mohammed-agashi-

Tags: Law articles
Previous Post

House of Reps approves Tinubu’s Emergency Declaration in Rivers State

Next Post

Like Reps, Senate approves Tinubu’s Emergency Declaration in Rivers State

iDeemlawful

iDeemlawful

Related Posts

Daura v U.B.N PLC: Landmark Supreme Court Decision on ‘Estate and Debt’ Responsibilities after Death
Commentary

Daura v U.B.N PLC: Landmark Supreme Court Decision on ‘Estate and Debt’ Responsibilities after Death

PROHIBITION OF RIBĀ (INTEREST-BASED TRANSACTIONS) IN ISLAMIC FINANCE: CONCEPT AND SIGNIFICANCE
Commentary

PROHIBITION OF RIBĀ (INTEREST-BASED TRANSACTIONS) IN ISLAMIC FINANCE: CONCEPT AND SIGNIFICANCE

Implications of Signing Court Processes with Name of Law Firm in Lieu of Lawyer’s Name in Nigeria
Commentary

Implications of Signing Court Processes with Name of Law Firm in Lieu of Lawyer’s Name in Nigeria

THE DOCTRINE OF NO CASE SUBMISSION: A LEGAL ANALYSIS
Commentary

THE DOCTRINE OF NO CASE SUBMISSION: A LEGAL ANALYSIS

ISLAMIC FINANCE IN THE LIGHT OF ETHICS AND PROFIT
Commentary

ISLAMIC FINANCE IN THE LIGHT OF ETHICS AND PROFIT

EMERGING ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN DATA PROTECTION
Commentary

EMERGING ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN DATA PROTECTION

Shari’ah Arbitration Panels: A Fundamental Right for Muslims in Southwestern Nigeria
Commentary

Shari’ah Arbitration Panels: A Fundamental Right for Muslims in Southwestern Nigeria

WHY IGNORING CONTRACT CLAUSES CAN LEAD TO BIG PROBLEMS AND THE IMPORTANT NEED OF PARTIES TO PROTECT THEMSELVES BEFORE SIGNING A CONTRACT
Commentary

NOTABLE INNOVATIONS & REFORMS IN THE INVESTMENT AND SECURITIES ACT, 2024

WHY IGNORING CONTRACT CLAUSES CAN LEAD TO BIG PROBLEMS AND THE IMPORTANT NEED OF PARTIES TO PROTECT THEMSELVES BEFORE SIGNING A CONTRACT
Commentary

WHY IGNORING CONTRACT CLAUSES CAN LEAD TO BIG PROBLEMS AND THE IMPORTANT NEED OF PARTIES TO PROTECT THEMSELVES BEFORE SIGNING A CONTRACT

PRINCIPALITIES IN THE COMMISSION OF AN OFFENCE UNDER THE CRIMlNAL CODE ACT
Commentary

PRINCIPALITIES IN THE COMMISSION OF AN OFFENCE UNDER THE CRIMlNAL CODE ACT

Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

iDeemlawful

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy

Connect With Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In