• Latest
  • Trending
CAUSATION AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN NIGERIA; THE POSITION OF THE LAW

CAUSATION AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN NIGERIA; THE POSITION OF THE LAW

Tinubu’s Minister Nnaji Admits Certificate Forgery

Tinubu’s Minister Nnaji Admits Certificate Forgery

What you need to Know about ‘New deadly’ Lakurawa Group Terrorising Nigeria’s Northwest

27 Killed as Bandits Strike Again in Kogi Communities

‘Watch Your Tongue’: Onoh knocks Jonathan Over Boko Haram Remark

‘Watch Your Tongue’: Onoh knocks Jonathan Over Boko Haram Remark

JUST IN: Tinubu’s Minister Nnaji Involved in Certificate Scandal

JUST IN: Tinubu’s Minister Nnaji Involved in Certificate Scandal

Zamfara LG Chairman Sparks Buzz After Sharing Phones, Power Banks to Youths (Video)

Zamfara LG Chairman Sparks Buzz After Sharing Phones, Power Banks to Youths (Video)

Jonathan Clarifies Linking Buhari to Boko Haram Crisis Claims

Jonathan Clarifies Linking Buhari to Boko Haram Crisis Claims

Fresh Graduate Gunned Down by Stray Bullet After Collecting NYSC Call-Up

Fresh Graduate Gunned Down by Stray Bullet After Collecting NYSC Call-Up

Sunday, October 5, 2025
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • LifeStyle
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus
iDeemlawful
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • LifeStyle
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus
Home GPS Gadget law Articles
CAUSATION AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN NIGERIA; THE POSITION OF THE LAW

CAUSATION AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN NIGERIA; THE POSITION OF THE LAW

by iDeemlawful
September 17, 2022
in law Articles, Opinion
A A
0

CAUSATION AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN NIGERIA; THE POSITION OF THE LAW.

                 BY M.B KUCHICHI 

Preamble:

In criminal Law, before the accused is said to be convicted, there must be a causal link between the action of the accused person and death of the deceased/victim. Where however, there is no link between the act of the accused and the death of the deceased, there can be no criminal liability on the part of the accused. Hence, ACTUS NOVUS INTERVENIN should not be inferred from the circumstances of the case.

SeeThese

SENATOR NATASHA AND THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY: DENIAL OF RIGHTS OR ENFORCEMENT OF FORMS AND DISCIPLINE

PENGASSAN, DANGOTE, AND THE PERILS OF UNCHECKED CAPITALISM IN NIGERIA’S OIL SECTOR: WHY PROTECTING UNIONISM MATTERS

MARITAL DESERTION: ABANDONING A MARRIAGE PARTNER OR RUNNING AWAY FROM MARRIAGE

To sum everything up, in his wordings, while explaining this very topic to us in the lecture hall, Professor Yahaya Abubakar Muhammad said and I quote ” Mr. A administered poison to Mr. B, while in the process of dying, Mr. C shoot s Mr.B to death. Who caused the death?! ” This is just a rhetorical question which expressly levelled the guiltiness on the part of Mr. C.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the other hand, contributory negligence is never a defense to criminal liability. What this mean is that where the victim died as a result of his negligence to take proper medication or care or even blood transfusion, the accused still remain liable of his act. Thus for example:

In the case of R V. BLAUE (1975) Vol 3 All E.R, the accused stabbed the deceased who was subsequently taken to the hospital. At the hospital, the victim refused to take blood transfusion because it was against her faith as a Jehovah witness. The court convicted the accused for manslaughter.

On appeal, the accused contended that the refusal of the deceased to take transfusion because of her religion was unreasonable. Thus, it should be held to have broken the causal chain. The court of appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld the accused’s conviction.

The court had this to say:

” It has long been the policy of the law that those who use violence on other people must take their victim as they find them. This, in our judgement, means the whole man and not just the physical man.

It does not lie in the mouth of the assailant to say that the victim’s religious beliefs which inhibited him from accepting certain kinds of treatment were unreasonable.

The question for decision is “what caused her death?” And the answer is the stab wound. The fact that the victim refused to stop this end coming about did not break the causal connection between the act and the death.”

In R. V. HOLLAND, the court held that a treatment like stitches, or antiseptic cleansing and bandaging could likely have saved the victim, however its refusal and resultant death would not let the accused go scott free.

By the provision of S.312 of the Criminal Code, when a person causes a bodily injury to another from which death results, it is immaterial that the injury might have been avoided by proper precaution on the part of the person injured, or that his death from that injury might have been prevented by proper care or treatment. This is similar to the provisions of the Hallsbury’s Laws of England.

It should also be noted that by the provision of S.310 of the Criminal Code, a person would be deemed to have killed another if by threat, intimidation or deceit, he causes that other person to do an act or make an omission which results in his death.

In the case of R. V. NWAOKE (1939) Vol 5 WACA, the accused threatened the deceased with a charm that if he doesn’t pay up the debt that he owed the accused, he would not be able to eat or sleep and he would subsequently die. Subsequently, the deceased was depressed and he committed suicide.

The trial court convicted the accused. On appeal, the West African Court of Appeal allowed the appeal on the ground that there was no causal link between the threat of the accused and the subsequent suicide of the deceased. Thus, the accused was discharged and acquitted.

It is also important to note that, by section 314 of the Criminal Code, chain of causation is broken where the victim dies after the expiration of a year and a day.

On a final note, however, where there is contradictory evidences as to what actually causes the death of the deceased, there can be no liability on the part of the accused person. Thus, in OFORLETE vs The STATE (2000) vol 12 NWLR pt 681, the accused hit the deceased on the head with a kitchen stool. Complications didn’t arise until three months later when the head of the deceased got swollen. He was rushed to the hospital where he spent two weeks and was subsequently sent to a psychiatric hospital where he died.

There was contradictory evidence of two medical doctors that there was the possibility of a different factor causing the death of the deceased. The trial court convicted the accused. On appeal, the court of appeal upheld the decision of the trial court.

On further appeal to the Supreme Court, the court set aside the judgement of the lower court and was of the opinion that in establishing a causal link between the act of the accused and the relevant consequence as a factual question, no aspect of the enquiry should be left to assumption, speculation or conjecture.

M.B KUCHICHI
Final Year student of Law, University of Maiduguri. 14th Sept, 2022.
modubabakuchichi@gmail.com

Tags: M.B KUCHICHIopinion
Previous Post

Ex-UNIJOS VC heads Plateau APC gov campaign

Next Post

15 Steps, Actions to Claim Estates, Assets Of Dead Parents, Grandparents, Other Relatives Who Died In UK [Full List Dead Nigerians With Unclaimed Properties]

Next Read

PENGASSAN, DANGOTE, AND THE PERILS OF UNCHECKED CAPITALISM IN NIGERIA’S OIL SECTOR: WHY PROTECTING UNIONISM MATTERS
Commentary

PENGASSAN, DANGOTE, AND THE PERILS OF UNCHECKED CAPITALISM IN NIGERIA’S OIL SECTOR: WHY PROTECTING UNIONISM MATTERS

...

Read moreDetails
Understanding Capital Markets in Nigeria and the United States of America
Commentary

Understanding Capital Markets in Nigeria and the United States of America

...

Read moreDetails
UNRULY PASSENGERS UNDER NIGERIAN AVIATION LAW: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Commentary

UNRULY PASSENGERS UNDER NIGERIAN AVIATION LAW: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS

...

Read moreDetails
MY HOME TOWN (MUWO, NUPE) by MUSTAPHA SULAIMAN MAMMAN
LifeStyle

MY HOME TOWN (MUWO, NUPE) by MUSTAPHA SULAIMAN MAMMAN

...

Read moreDetails
When Wolves Wear Sheep’s Clothing by Fatimah Hamid
Commentary

When Wolves Wear Sheep’s Clothing by Fatimah Hamid

...

Read moreDetails
Essentiality or Otherwise of the Defendant’s Presence in a Criminal Litigation: A Constitutional Right of Fair Hearing —Composed By Adeshina Umarfaruq Olaitan
law Articles

Essentiality or Otherwise of the Defendant’s Presence in a Criminal Litigation: A Constitutional Right of Fair Hearing —Composed By Adeshina Umarfaruq Olaitan

...

Read moreDetails
‘Rental Nightmares’: How house agents bleed tenants dry with fraudulent, multiple inspection fees
Commentary

‘Rental Nightmares’: How house agents bleed tenants dry with fraudulent, multiple inspection fees

...

Read moreDetails
THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION
Commentary

THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION

...

Read moreDetails
Next Post
15 Steps, Actions to Claim Estates, Assets Of Dead Parents, Grandparents, Other Relatives Who Died In UK [Full List Dead Nigerians With Unclaimed Properties]

15 Steps, Actions to Claim Estates, Assets Of Dead Parents, Grandparents, Other Relatives Who Died In UK [Full List Dead Nigerians With Unclaimed Properties]

JUST IN: Police disperse, teargas Obi’s supporters in Ebonyi

JUST IN: Police disperse, teargas Obi’s supporters in Ebonyi

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

iDeemlawful

Copyright © 2019 iDeemlawful.

Useful Links

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial
  • Support

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Copyright © 2019 iDeemlawful.