Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
Compensation for a damage or an injury done is just another means to console the aggrieved individual and to put him in the same situation he would have been if the damage or injury hasn’t been done.
The above amongst others is the objectives of Compensation and not to be seen as a profit Making means nor defraud
“Per RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C.
DOUBLE COMPENSATION: Whether a party can be compensated twice for the same injury “Equity would not allow the Appellant to be compensated twice. If allowed, there would no longer be justice between the parties. Fraud would be enthroned, and transparency and good faith jettisoned, and that would be bad for the justice system.”
