• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
Substitution OF CANDIDATE(S): AN OVERVIEW OF THE EXTANT PROVISIONS OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022 by Imam Abdur-Rasheed Ahmed, Esq

Substitution OF CANDIDATE(S): AN OVERVIEW OF THE EXTANT PROVISIONS OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022 by Imam Abdur-Rasheed Ahmed, Esq

2025 UTME Results to be Released Today – JAMB

2025 UTME Results to be Released Today – JAMB

FG declares free C-Section for Nigerian Women

Drama as 18-Year-old Apprentice impregnates Master’s Daughter, 9 Others in Anambra

JUST IN: VeryDarkMan released from EFCC custody

JUST IN: VeryDarkMan released from EFCC custody

Nigeria Pays Back all N2.59trn IMF Debt

Nigeria Pays Back all N2.59trn IMF Debt

JUST-IN: Social Activist VeryDarkMan Arrested by EFCC

VeryDarkMan’s lawyer expresses frustration over Bail Difficulties

Nnamdi Kanu’s Sister-in-law barred from Court for Livestreaming Proceeding

Nnamdi Kanu’s Sister-in-law barred from Court for Livestreaming Proceeding

JUST-IN: Social Activist VeryDarkMan Arrested by EFCC

EFCC releases VeryDarkMan on Bail

EFCC reacts to BBC Pidgin report on VeryDarkBlackMan’s arrest

EFCC reacts to BBC Pidgin report on VeryDarkBlackMan’s arrest

Catholic Bishops Reply Trump Over AI-Generated Pope Image

Catholic Bishops Reply Trump Over AI-Generated Pope Image

FCCPC Replies  Meta’s threat to Quit Nigeria over ₦220 Million Fine

FCCPC Replies Meta’s threat to Quit Nigeria over ₦220 Million Fine

NNPC reduces NMDPRA fee Per-Litre petrol in New Pricing Template

$3bn Refinery Fraud: N80bn found in sacked MD’s Bank Accounts

Kwara Law Students’ Association Accuses Unrecognized Actors of Sabotaging Scholarship Process”

Kwara Law Students’ Association Accuses Unrecognized Actors of Sabotaging Scholarship Process”

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy
Friday, May 9, 2025
  • Login
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Commentary
  • Editorial
  • Campus
Home GPS Gadget law Articles

Substitution OF CANDIDATE(S): AN OVERVIEW OF THE EXTANT PROVISIONS OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022 by Imam Abdur-Rasheed Ahmed, Esq

by iDeemlawful
July 27, 2022
A A
Substitution OF CANDIDATE(S): AN OVERVIEW OF THE EXTANT PROVISIONS OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022 by Imam Abdur-Rasheed Ahmed, Esq
FacebookTwitterWhatsapp

Abstract
Undoubtedly, the law is crystal clear about the modus operandi and/or procedure(s) the political parties must adopt in the substitution of candidates and replace them with those they believe could win elections and deliver on electoral promises to the citizenry.

Pointedly, the law frowns at indiscriminate and bizarre substitution of candidates by political parties, which is borne out of inordinate ambition to own, control, and manipulate democratic principles by individuals within the political space.

Basically this piece seeks to consider the right of the political parties in their quest to substitute candidate(s) vis-à-vis the conduct of a fresh primary election, which produce(s) another member of the party, sought to be substituted.

RelatedPosts

Trump 2.0: everything, everywhere, all at once

THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION

Sexually transmitted Diseases and the Law: Can victims in Nigeria seek Justice? by Lanase Usman

MEDIATOR ACTING AS ARBITRATOR: UNDERSTANDING SECTION 79 OF THE ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION ACT, 2023

A passionate exposition of Section 29 (1) of the Electoral Act, 2022 provides that a party shall not later than 180 days before the date appointed for the general election submit to INEC, list of candidates the party intends to sponsor for election, the candidate having emerged from a valid primary conducted by the political party.

This section further states that a candidate submitted by a political party can be disqualified if it is found that such candidate does nor meet the constitutional requirement, to wit; he is bankrupt, a convict, presented false information as to his qualification to INEC, among others.

The Act donates to the Federal High Court the original jurisdiction to determine the status of candidate(s) as to his/her qualification. Further, where a candidate is disqualified by the court, the political party whose candidate scores the highest number of votes, and satisfied the constitutional requirement is declared the winner of the primary election. Articles 8 and 10 of the APC, Guidelines for Nomination of Candidates for the 2023, General Election also supports the constitutional disqualification of candidates.


Conversely, the Act is crystal clear on the modus operandi of political parties in relation to withdrawal of candidate(s). A cursory look at Section 31 of the Electoral Act, states as follows:
“A candidate may withdraw his or candidate by notice in writing signed by him and delivered personally by the candidate to the political party that nominated him for the election and the political party shall convey such withdrawal to the Commission not later than 90 days to the election”


When can we say a candidate’s withdrawal is valid in law?.

The below germane elements must be considered, anon;
i. The candidate must notify the political party in writing, his /her withdrawal as the party’s candidate.
ii. The candidate must submit such notice of withdrawal in person to the political party.
iii. The political party shall convey the withdrawal of such candidate to INEC not later than 90 days to the election.


It is humbly submitted that where there is full compliance with the above, it can be validly opined that a candidate is deemed in law to have withdrawn his nomination. Albeit, this is not the end of the matter. I say this because, Section 33 of the Electoral Act, provides for the manner of substitution in the case of withdrawal and/or death of a candidate. The Section provides thus:
“A political party shall not be allowed to change or substitute its candidate whose name has been submitted under section 29 of this Act, except in the case of death or withdrawal by the candidate: Provided that in the case of such withdrawal or death of candidate, the political party affected shall within 14 days of the occurrence of the event, hold a fresh primary election to produce and submit a fresh candidate to the commission for the election concerned.”


Notwithstanding the provision of Section 29 of the Act, which deals with submission of list of candidates the party intends to sponsor at election, having emerged from valid primaries conducted by a political party. The Act therefore allows the political party, to within 14 days of her candidate’s withdrawal and/or death, initiate a process of fresh primaries election which shall produce the party’s new candidate, that will be submitted to INEC.


Ultimately, where the political party strictly follows the above procedure. in her quest to withdraw or substitute her candidate with another, the court will rather have no jurisdiction to dabble into the internal workings of the political party as it were. This is consistent with the provision of the law when the Court of Appeal in the case of OMAJALI V. DAVID & ORS (2019) LPELR-47928 (CA), per OMAGE, JCA while adopting the reasoning of SANUSI, JSC in the case of AGI v. P.D.P (2017) 17 NWLR (PT. 1595) 386 @ 475 put the law in the succinct manner thus:
“The provision of the law still remains valid and subsisting that the issue of nomination and or sponsorship of candidate by a political party to contest an election on its behalf or platform, is purely within the domain or prescient of such political party and the court lacks jurisdiction to nominate or part-take in the process of nomination of candidate for any political party to represent or contest election in its behalf….. The party is therefore supreme and has a final say or decision… From the above sited authorities, one thing is clear, that the nomination and selection of a candidate for election is the internal affairs of the political party and they have 100% control over it. The court dare not interfere in it……”


It is worthy to note that the political party will have itself to blame if it failed to follow and/or adopt the extant provision of the Electoral Act, 2022 which allows political parties to substitute her candidate based on death and/or withdrawal. Where the political failed to adhere to the strict letters of the Act, as regards substitution of her candidate(s), the court will be called in aid to dabble into the internal workings of the political party in fragrant contravention of the Electoral Act, 2022 and Parties Guidelines for Elections, among others.

The substitution of Umahi, Akpabio and others will only the valid if the law is strictly adhered to and nothing more. It need be stressed that the court has held severally, that where the political failed to play the game as provided by law, the court will have to adjudicate between disputants. My Lord, Ngwuta, JSC in the case of C.P.C V. OMBUDAGU (2013) 18 NWLR (PT.1385) 66 @ 129-130 stated the law pointedly thus:
“It is apparent that a few political elements therein hijack(sic) the parties and arrogate to themselves right to sell elective and appointive positions to the party member who can afford same….. There is a popular saying that politics is a dirty game. I do not share this view. It is the players who are dirty and they inflict their filth on their members… Politicians must learn to play the game of politics in strict compliance with it strolls of organized society.”
It is rather bizarre the contention of some commentators that the new Electoral Act, 2022 incriminate candidate(s) who participate in two (2) primaries within the same political party. This opinion is not consistent with the Act, to say the least. Section 115 (i) (k) provides thus:
‘A person who-
Sign a nomination paper consenting to be a candidate that he or she is in eligible to be candidate at that election, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a maximum term of imprisonment of two years.”
Apparently, from the tenor of the above section, the below germane issue is worthy to note, anon;
• A Person commits an offence and liable to conviction to a maximum term of imprisonment of two (2) years if:
i. He signs a nomination paper consenting to be a candidate at an election, knowing he/she is not eligible or qualified to such nomination.
Notably, Section 152 of the Act, which is the interpretation section does not define who a person is per se it ratter defined an aspirant as “a person who aspires or strives to contest an election to a political office”. Therefore any aspirant in a political party who applies to be nominated as the political party’s candidate, and is eminently qualified to contest in such election cannot be criminalized based on his application to contest in two (2) elective positions within his party. The Constitution and the Act is blatantly clear on the grounds upon which an aspirant will be ineligible or unqualified to contest elections.

Imam Abdur-Rasheed Ahmed, Esq
8LL.B; LLM (Ife); M.Phil (Ife); Ph.D (O.A.U, Ife, in view); B.L.
Former Prosecutor to the Federation (Federal Ministry of Justice, Abuja);
Former Legal Adviser, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Abuja.
08032883527.

Tags: GPS Gadget
Previous Post

2023: WHY TINUBU, ATIKU, PETER OBI AND KWANKWASO NOT QUALIFIED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENCY! By: Keulere Nabil O.

Next Post

Nigerians React As Gbajabiamila Back To School In U.S Amid ASUU Strike, NLC Protest [photos]

iDeemlawful

iDeemlawful

Related Posts

Essentiality or Otherwise of the Defendant’s Presence in a Criminal Litigation: A Constitutional Right of Fair Hearing —Composed By Adeshina Umarfaruq Olaitan
law Articles

Essentiality or Otherwise of the Defendant’s Presence in a Criminal Litigation: A Constitutional Right of Fair Hearing —Composed By Adeshina Umarfaruq Olaitan

THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION
Commentary

THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION

Commentary

Sexually transmitted Diseases and the Law: Can victims in Nigeria seek Justice? by Lanase Usman

Illustration of mediator and arbitrator
Commentary

MEDIATOR ACTING AS ARBITRATOR: UNDERSTANDING SECTION 79 OF THE ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION ACT, 2023

Lagos govt mandates permits for amplified sound in nightclubs, worship centres
law Articles

Lagos govt mandates permits for amplified sound in nightclubs, worship centres

Shariah law —– a foreign law in a foreign land
Commentary

Shariah law —– a foreign law in a foreign land

DOES ISLAMIC LAW OF CONTRACT RECOGNIZED ELECTRONIC AGENCY?
Commentary

DOES ISLAMIC LAW OF CONTRACT RECOGNIZED ELECTRONIC AGENCY?

Economic Stabilization Bills: A Step Towards Economic Recovery with Challenges Ahead
Commentary

Economic Stabilization Bills: A Step Towards Economic Recovery with Challenges Ahead

Rising Tide of ACL Injuries in Football: Analyzing the impact of excessive match fixtures and competitions – BY SULEIMAN ABDULTAWAB
Commentary

Reforming FIFA’s Transfer Rules: The Lassana Diarra Trial, Legal Implications, and Future Prospects

#EndBadGovernance: Outrage as Police arraign 32 ‘hungry’ Children for Treason, four Collapse in Court
Commentary

EXPLAINER: Prosecution of Underage Children Under Nigerian Law?

Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

iDeemlawful

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy

Connect With Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In