• Latest
  • Trending
  • All

ALTERATION OF WRITTEN DOCUMENT BY ORAL EVIDENCE: THE POSITION OF THE LAW BY ELEJA HUSSEIN KEHINDE

FG declares free C-Section for Nigerian Women

Drama as 18-Year-old Apprentice impregnates Master’s Daughter, 9 Others in Anambra

JUST IN: VeryDarkMan released from EFCC custody

JUST IN: VeryDarkMan released from EFCC custody

Nigeria Pays Back all N2.59trn IMF Debt

Nigeria Pays Back all N2.59trn IMF Debt

JUST-IN: Social Activist VeryDarkMan Arrested by EFCC

VeryDarkMan’s lawyer expresses frustration over Bail Difficulties

Nnamdi Kanu’s Sister-in-law barred from Court for Livestreaming Proceeding

Nnamdi Kanu’s Sister-in-law barred from Court for Livestreaming Proceeding

JUST-IN: Social Activist VeryDarkMan Arrested by EFCC

EFCC releases VeryDarkMan on Bail

EFCC reacts to BBC Pidgin report on VeryDarkBlackMan’s arrest

EFCC reacts to BBC Pidgin report on VeryDarkBlackMan’s arrest

Catholic Bishops Reply Trump Over AI-Generated Pope Image

Catholic Bishops Reply Trump Over AI-Generated Pope Image

FCCPC Replies  Meta’s threat to Quit Nigeria over ₦220 Million Fine

FCCPC Replies Meta’s threat to Quit Nigeria over ₦220 Million Fine

NNPC reduces NMDPRA fee Per-Litre petrol in New Pricing Template

$3bn Refinery Fraud: N80bn found in sacked MD’s Bank Accounts

Kwara Law Students’ Association Accuses Unrecognized Actors of Sabotaging Scholarship Process”

Kwara Law Students’ Association Accuses Unrecognized Actors of Sabotaging Scholarship Process”

Court Fixes Dec 1 For The Judgment On Ogun PDP Guber Ticket Tussle [Details]

NJC Suspends Justices Iyang, Ekwo, Aliyu For 1 Year Over Misconduct, 27 Others Face Probe

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy
Friday, May 9, 2025
  • Login
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Commentary
  • Editorial
  • Campus
Home GPS Gadget law Articles

ALTERATION OF WRITTEN DOCUMENT BY ORAL EVIDENCE: THE POSITION OF THE LAW BY ELEJA HUSSEIN KEHINDE

by iDeemlawful
July 27, 2021
A A
FacebookTwitterWhatsapp

RelatedPosts

Trump 2.0: everything, everywhere, all at once

THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION

Sexually transmitted Diseases and the Law: Can victims in Nigeria seek Justice? by Lanase Usman

MEDIATOR ACTING AS ARBITRATOR: UNDERSTANDING SECTION 79 OF THE ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION ACT, 2023

Introduction
It is believe that a contract can be made either through written agreement or oral agreement, but not all contracts can be made by oral agreement as in the case of formal contract which is required in law to be in writing, signed, sealed and delivered. On the other hand, in giving evidence in court, both oral testimony and documentary evidence are allowed in law to be admissible. However, the most reliable, if not the best evidence is documentary evidence. That is to say, the law accords primacy to documentary evidence over oral evidence. It is trite, in the formation of contract and admissibility of evidence, that document has supremacy over oral indication. Consequently, where there is conflict between documentary evidence and oral testimony, the contents of documentary evidence shall prevail. Owing to this, this legal excerpt explores the position of the law on whether oral evidence is admissible to add to, vary, alter, subtract from, or contradict the contents and terms of the written agreement/document.
The General Position of the Law
The Evidence Act, 2011through section 128(1) asserts thus:
“When a judgment of a court or any other judicial or official proceeding, contract or any grant or other disposition of property has been reduced to the form of a document or series of documents, no evidence may be given of such judgment or proceeding or of the terms of such contract, grant or disposition of property except the document itself, or secondary evidence of its contents in cases in which secondary evidence is admissible under this Act; nor may the contents of any such document be contradicted, altered, added to or varied by oral evidence.” (the underline is mine for emphasis).
It is settled principle of law that where there is oral evidence as well documentary evidence, the documentary evidence is used as a hanger for which to assess the oral testimony. See KINDEY v MILITARY GOV. OF GONGOLA STATE (1988) 2 NWLR (pt. 77) pg. 455. HAWAD INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS LTD. v MINA PROJECT VENTURES LTD. (2003) 39 WRN 57 @ 69.
As a result, oral evidence cannot be used to contradict contents of documentary evidence. See MADU v MADU (2008) 6 NWLR (pt. 1083) pg. 296 @ 324 S.C. para. F – H. Also per Onnoghen, J.S.C. pg. 17, para. B – C in EMMANUEL OLAMIDE LARMIE v DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE & SERVICES LTD. (2005) LPELR – S.C. 157/2001 held thus:
“It is the law that where parties have embodied the terms of their contract in a written document, extrinsic evidence is not admissible to add to, vary, subtract from or contradict the terms of the written instrument.”
Therefore, oral evidence is inadmissible either to add to or subtract from the contents of a document as a document speaks for itself with the result that parties cannot give evidence contrary to its contents. In other words, where a case is fought on pleadings supported by documentary evidence, oral evidence is not allowed to contradict the clear terms of the documents since the task before the court is to interpret or construct the terms of the document. See ASHAKACEM PLC v ASHARATUL MUBASHSHURUN INVESTMENT LTD (2019) LPELR – 46541 (SC).
Exception to the Rule
The beauty and handsomeness of law is that wherever it gives birth to a particular general rule, it does support that rule with exceptions base on surrounding circumstances to the application of the rule to the existing facts.
Pursuant to the proviso to section 128(1) of Evidence Act, 2011, the following exceptions are deducible:
1. Where the oral agreement preceded the content of the document, the evidence of oral agreement may be given. See SEWONIKU v OROTIOSAKIN (1986) 3 NWLR (pt. 30) pg. 597.
2. Oral evidence may be allowed to prove the existence of any separate oral agreement as to any matter on which the document is silent. Oral evidence can be given when the documents are silent provided that the oral evidence is consistent with the contents of the document. See ALLI v IKUSEBIALA (1985) 1 NWLR (pt. 4) pg. 630.
3. Where the circumstances of the case require that the court may infer that the parties did not intend the document to be a complete and final statement of transaction between the parties. That is where the contract is partly written and partly oral; the court will allow the parties to give verbal evidence. See OLAGUNJI v RAJI (1986) 5 NWLR (pt. 42) pg. 48.
4. Extrinsic evidence may be admitted to resolve an ambiguity in the contract. Oral evidence is admissible in respect of matters ambiguously described in a document. See SCOA v BOURDEX (1990) 3 NWLR (pt. 138) pg. 380.
5. To prove illegality, fraud, intimidation, mistakes, want of consideration or any other matter which if proved by oral evidence will produce an effect upon the validity of the document or any party of it (i.e. the identity of the parties to the agreement). See SALAMI v SAVANAH (1990) 2 NWLR (pt. 130) pg. 160.
6. To prove capacity in which a person contracted if the written contract or conveyance does not disclose that capacity or that the person who contracted as owner is not the true owner. See UDOGWU v OKO (1990) 5 NWLR (pt. 153) pg. 721.
7. Where a document is undated, oral evidence is admissible to show when it was written and from what date it was intended that it should operate. See AMIZU v NZERIBE (1989) 4 NWLR (pt. 118) pg. 755.
8. Where there is the existence of any distinct subsequent oral agreement to rescind or modify any such written contract or disposition of property.
9. If there is the existence of any particular usage or customs by which incidents are attached to a contract then it can proved by oral evidence. For instance, where the language used in the written document has a particular meaning by custom or usage in a particular trade, industry or region, oral evidence of that meaning is admissible. See HUTTON v WARREN.
Conclusion
It is crystal clear now that the rule which says that a written document cannot be varied, altered, contradicted, added to or subtracted from by oral evidence exists with exceptions. If the circumstance of the case does not revolve around any of the aforementioned exceptions, the rule will be applied stricto sensu. By so doing, the nature and circumstance of the case have to be taken into cognizance in totality.
Tags: GPS GadgetPod Studio
Previous Post

OJUDE OBA 2021: Engr. C. O Adebayo celebrates Ojude Oba 2021 with his people at his country home.

Next Post

Twitter Ban: Critical analysis Between National Security And Pecuniary Benefits By Elder Yinka Salaam

iDeemlawful

iDeemlawful

Related Posts

Essentiality or Otherwise of the Defendant’s Presence in a Criminal Litigation: A Constitutional Right of Fair Hearing —Composed By Adeshina Umarfaruq Olaitan
law Articles

Essentiality or Otherwise of the Defendant’s Presence in a Criminal Litigation: A Constitutional Right of Fair Hearing —Composed By Adeshina Umarfaruq Olaitan

THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION
Commentary

THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION

Commentary

Sexually transmitted Diseases and the Law: Can victims in Nigeria seek Justice? by Lanase Usman

Illustration of mediator and arbitrator
Commentary

MEDIATOR ACTING AS ARBITRATOR: UNDERSTANDING SECTION 79 OF THE ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION ACT, 2023

Lagos govt mandates permits for amplified sound in nightclubs, worship centres
law Articles

Lagos govt mandates permits for amplified sound in nightclubs, worship centres

Shariah law —– a foreign law in a foreign land
Commentary

Shariah law —– a foreign law in a foreign land

DOES ISLAMIC LAW OF CONTRACT RECOGNIZED ELECTRONIC AGENCY?
Commentary

DOES ISLAMIC LAW OF CONTRACT RECOGNIZED ELECTRONIC AGENCY?

Economic Stabilization Bills: A Step Towards Economic Recovery with Challenges Ahead
Commentary

Economic Stabilization Bills: A Step Towards Economic Recovery with Challenges Ahead

Rising Tide of ACL Injuries in Football: Analyzing the impact of excessive match fixtures and competitions – BY SULEIMAN ABDULTAWAB
Commentary

Reforming FIFA’s Transfer Rules: The Lassana Diarra Trial, Legal Implications, and Future Prospects

#EndBadGovernance: Outrage as Police arraign 32 ‘hungry’ Children for Treason, four Collapse in Court
Commentary

EXPLAINER: Prosecution of Underage Children Under Nigerian Law?

Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

iDeemlawful

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy

Connect With Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In