• Latest
  • Trending
  • All

Denying liability of an oral agreement by Saheed Afeez Ayinde

Tinubu Gives Fresh Appointment to Babangida’s Son, Others

Tinubu Gives Fresh Appointment to Babangida’s Son, Others

FULL TEXT: Tinubu’s tribute for Buhari at special FEC

FULL TEXT: Tinubu’s tribute for Buhari at special FEC

President Tinubu extends Christmas Greetings to Nigerians

Tinubu renames Maiduguri Varsity after Buhari

Muhammadu Buhari (1942–2025): Life, Times, “Presidency and Medical Trips”

Seven Powerful Quotes From Buhari That Shaped His Presidency

How President Tinubu, Opposition Coalition Leaders Snubbed Each Other at Buhari’s burial

How President Tinubu, Opposition Coalition Leaders Snubbed Each Other at Buhari’s burial

How Buhari was Honoured, Buried

How Buhari was Honoured, Buried

Oluwo reacts to Islamic Burial rite of Late Awujale of Ijebuland

Oluwo reacts to Islamic Burial rite of Late Awujale of Ijebuland

ADC website Crashes as Nigerians flood site to join Coalition Party

ADC: Five Unveiling Crisis casting doubts on the New Coalition

Court stops Senate disciplinary action against Natasha Akpoti

What we know about Senate Suspension of Natasha Akpoti: 7 Latest Developments

Knocks for ex-VP Atiku after dumping PDP for Third-Time

Knocks for ex-VP Atiku after dumping PDP for Third-Time

How Buhari secretly divorced Aisha before His Death as Kperogi Questions Her roleplay as Wife During Burial

How Buhari secretly divorced Aisha before His Death as Kperogi Questions Her roleplay as Wife During Burial

Drama As Traditionalists Barred From Awujale’s Burial In Ijebu-Ode

Drama As Traditionalists Barred From Awujale’s Burial In Ijebu-Ode

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy
Saturday, July 19, 2025
  • Login
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Commentary
  • Editorial
  • Campus

Denying liability of an oral agreement by Saheed Afeez Ayinde

by Afeez Ayinde Saheed
June 27, 2023
A A
FacebookTwitterWhatsapp

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

RelatedPosts

Trump 2.0: everything, everywhere, all at once

THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION

Sexually transmitted Diseases and the Law: Can victims in Nigeria seek Justice? by Lanase Usman

MEDIATOR ACTING AS ARBITRATOR: UNDERSTANDING SECTION 79 OF THE ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION ACT, 2023

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 
Tags: GPS Gadget
Previous Post

DEATH’S MISSION by Amdalat Iyabo Sulaiman

Next Post

June12: Wear Your Thinking Cap

Afeez Ayinde Saheed

Afeez Ayinde Saheed

Related Posts

Tinubu Gives Fresh Appointment to Babangida’s Son, Others
Politics News

Tinubu Gives Fresh Appointment to Babangida’s Son, Others

FULL TEXT: Tinubu’s tribute for Buhari at special FEC
Breaking News

FULL TEXT: Tinubu’s tribute for Buhari at special FEC

President Tinubu extends Christmas Greetings to Nigerians
Breaking News

Tinubu renames Maiduguri Varsity after Buhari

Muhammadu Buhari (1942–2025): Life, Times, “Presidency and Medical Trips”
Breaking News

Seven Powerful Quotes From Buhari That Shaped His Presidency

How President Tinubu, Opposition Coalition Leaders Snubbed Each Other at Buhari’s burial
Featured

How President Tinubu, Opposition Coalition Leaders Snubbed Each Other at Buhari’s burial

How Buhari was Honoured, Buried
Breaking News

How Buhari was Honoured, Buried

Oluwo reacts to Islamic Burial rite of Late Awujale of Ijebuland
Breaking News

Oluwo reacts to Islamic Burial rite of Late Awujale of Ijebuland

ADC website Crashes as Nigerians flood site to join Coalition Party
Featured

ADC: Five Unveiling Crisis casting doubts on the New Coalition

Court stops Senate disciplinary action against Natasha Akpoti
Politics News

What we know about Senate Suspension of Natasha Akpoti: 7 Latest Developments

Knocks for ex-VP Atiku after dumping PDP for Third-Time
Politics News

Knocks for ex-VP Atiku after dumping PDP for Third-Time

Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

iDeemlawful

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy

Connect With Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In