• Latest
  • Trending
  • All

Denying liability of an oral agreement by Saheed Afeez Ayinde

31 African Countries Affected by 3-Month Validity of US Visa: FULL LIST

31 African Countries Affected by 3-Month Validity of US Visa: FULL LIST

Why NNPC Refineries May Never Work Again – Dangote

Why NNPC Refineries May Never Work Again – Dangote

FG reacts as Trump mounts pressure on Nigeria to accept Venezuelan deportees from US

FG reacts as Trump mounts pressure on Nigeria to accept Venezuelan deportees from US

‘were you educated?’: Trump shocked as Liberian President speaks fluent English (Video)

‘were you educated?’: Trump shocked as Liberian President speaks fluent English (Video)

Reactions as CAC’s AI system approves ‘BokoHaram Hub’, ‘Nigeria Must Scatter’, others for Business Names

Reactions as CAC’s AI system approves ‘BokoHaram Hub’, ‘Nigeria Must Scatter’, others for Business Names

Candidates to Sue JAMB over UTME technical glitches

JAMB announces Top 3 Scorers in 2025 UTME

Nigerian Government pegs Admission Age at ’16’

Nigerian Government pegs Admission Age at ’16’

Trump threatens Nigeria with 10% Tariff for Supporting BRICS

Trump threatens Nigeria with 10% Tariff for Supporting BRICS

AAU ASUU Condemns SIT Over Alleged Activities, Set For Legal Action

ASUU begins Nationwide Strike

Why Ibadan Kings are always Old: Six Facts

Why Ibadan Kings are always Old: Six Facts

Things to Know About Next Olubadan-In-Waiting, Former Oyo Governor Rashidi Ladoja

Things to Know About Next Olubadan-In-Waiting, Former Oyo Governor Rashidi Ladoja

BREAKING: 43rd Olubadan of Ibadan is Dead

BREAKING: 43rd Olubadan of Ibadan is Dead

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy
Friday, July 11, 2025
  • Login
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
iDeemlawful
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Commentary
  • Editorial
  • Campus

Denying liability of an oral agreement by Saheed Afeez Ayinde

by Afeez Ayinde Saheed
June 27, 2023
A A
FacebookTwitterWhatsapp

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

RelatedPosts

Trump 2.0: everything, everywhere, all at once

THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY IN ARBITRATION

Sexually transmitted Diseases and the Law: Can victims in Nigeria seek Justice? by Lanase Usman

MEDIATOR ACTING AS ARBITRATOR: UNDERSTANDING SECTION 79 OF THE ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION ACT, 2023

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 

Oral Agreement is one of the forms of exchanging promises between two party, the promise that would later become obligations exchanged upon the assented party and known as contractual agreements.

The feature of this type of agreement, is one that is devoid of putting into writing, the details of the contract known as the terms of agreement.
It is a notable spot of defects in this kind of agreement, save where it bears commercial agreement i.e instant sales of commodity. 
This defect, is seen as an escape route to evade obligation by the default party as reflected in this case. 
S. A. Uredi V Jacob O.Dada (1988) All N.L.R 214 
The court in this case, while serving due justice to the party, also, attractively called to order, the sanity of the default party as duly observed per Oputa, JSC
“The facts of this case and the way it was handled, with the Appellant in his pleading strenuously denying the obvious, amply prove the saying that “matter divides whereas spirit unites.” Teach two people a prayer and it will keep them together but you give them a loaf of bread and they will quarrel over, during the sharing of it. And so it was that the Appellant and the Respondent who were very close friends, so close that the Respondent could confidently part with his N50,000.00 as his contribution to a proposed partnership without any receipt or other written acknowledgement, became enemies when it came to the sharing of the proceeds of their partnership venture and ultimately found themselves engaged in a protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court.”

Brought to you by
Saheed Afeez Ayinde 
Deemlawful 
Tags: GPS Gadget
Previous Post

DEATH’S MISSION by Amdalat Iyabo Sulaiman

Next Post

June12: Wear Your Thinking Cap

Afeez Ayinde Saheed

Afeez Ayinde Saheed

Related Posts

31 African Countries Affected by 3-Month Validity of US Visa: FULL LIST
Business News

31 African Countries Affected by 3-Month Validity of US Visa: FULL LIST

Why NNPC Refineries May Never Work Again – Dangote
Business News

Why NNPC Refineries May Never Work Again – Dangote

FG reacts as Trump mounts pressure on Nigeria to accept Venezuelan deportees from US
Breaking News

FG reacts as Trump mounts pressure on Nigeria to accept Venezuelan deportees from US

‘were you educated?’: Trump shocked as Liberian President speaks fluent English (Video)
International News

‘were you educated?’: Trump shocked as Liberian President speaks fluent English (Video)

Reactions as CAC’s AI system approves ‘BokoHaram Hub’, ‘Nigeria Must Scatter’, others for Business Names
Business News

Reactions as CAC’s AI system approves ‘BokoHaram Hub’, ‘Nigeria Must Scatter’, others for Business Names

Candidates to Sue JAMB over UTME technical glitches
Breaking News

JAMB announces Top 3 Scorers in 2025 UTME

Nigerian Government pegs Admission Age at ’16’
Breaking News

Nigerian Government pegs Admission Age at ’16’

Trump threatens Nigeria with 10% Tariff for Supporting BRICS
Featured

Trump threatens Nigeria with 10% Tariff for Supporting BRICS

AAU ASUU Condemns SIT Over Alleged Activities, Set For Legal Action
Breaking News

ASUU begins Nationwide Strike

Why Ibadan Kings are always Old: Six Facts
Breaking News

Why Ibadan Kings are always Old: Six Facts

Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

iDeemlawful

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Editorial Policy

Connect With Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Featured
  • Politics
  • Life Style
  • Advertise with Us
  • Opinion
  • Campus

Copyright © 2019–2025 Deemlawful Media

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In